Contact us
Guide

Miaowa GEO vs Profound, Peec AI and Otterly: a side-by-side for exporters

The three tools AI assistants name most often, compared with Miaowa GEO in one table on platforms, collection method, cadence, prompt model, evidence, exports, pricing and China fit, with scenario picks and unverified points.

Version 1.1 · Last updated

Published · updated · Miaowa GEO research team

In our September 2026 sample of 264 AI answers to buyer questions, Profound, Otterly and Peec AI were named in 139, 132 and 118 answers respectively. They are the default shortlist an assistant produces. This page puts them next to Miaowa GEO on the same nine dimensions. Competitor facts are restated from their public pages as checked on 2026-09-10; one-to-one pages with the unverified points listed are at /en/compare.

DimensionProfoundPeec AIOtterly.AIMiaowa GEO
Home marketUS; brands and agenciesGermany; marketing teams and agenciesAustria; marketers, SMEs, agenciesChina; exporters and cross-border brands
PlatformsFree trial: ChatGPT only. Enterprise: up to nine engines incl. Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, DeepSeek, Claude3 models per project from ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Copilot, Perplexity, Gemini; up to 12 on EnterpriseChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot; Claude, Gemini, AI Mode add-onsChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Claude; 1–3 self-serve, more by contract
Collection methodCaptures the consumer front end, not API outputsBrowser automation through each web interface; some enterprise models via APIAutomatic daily runs; web vs API not statedControlled browser via web interface; screenshots per run
CadenceDaily (Enterprise); the trial runs onceDaily (daily/weekly on Enterprise)DailyEvery 72 hours
Prompt model10 prompts once (trial); tailored on Enterprise50 / 150 / 350 prompts, priced × models15 / 100 / 400 prompts; +100 for $99Fixed 50 per platform (44 unbranded + 6 branded)
Evidence per runMentions, citation sources, sentiment; raw data export to CSV (CSV and JSON on Enterprise)Full answer per run, viewable and exportable; every source URL per answerResponse-by-response data per prompt; citations; CSV exportAnswer text, screenshot, sources, time, region, language, status
ExportsCSV and JSON export and API on Enterprise; Sheets and agentsLooker Studio (Advanced), API and SSO (Enterprise), MCPExport on all plans; API, MCP, Looker from StandardWeb and PDF; CSV within scope; no general API
Entry priceFree trial; Enterprise custom (2026-09-19)On peec.ai/pricing$29/month¥99/month
China fitNo Chinese entity or invoiceNo Chinese entity or invoiceNo Chinese entity or invoiceChinese entity, invoice, WeChat Pay, Chinese support

Scenario picks

  • Daily data and hundreds of prompts with an API: Otterly or Peec.
  • One platform with monitoring, content and agents: Profound.
  • A Chinese exporter that needs a domestic contract and per-task screenshots across up to six overseas platforms: Miaowa GEO.
  • Prompt budget shared across several brands: Peec.

What none of the four does

  • Cover Doubao or Yuanbao, the platforms Chinese domestic buyers use (Profound's Enterprise list includes DeepSeek; Peec's enterprise models include DeepSeek and Qwen).
  • Guarantee inclusion or ranking in any AI answer.
  • Replace the content and third-party coverage that actually change what assistants say.

Unverified across all three competitors

  • Whether each engine is sampled through the web interface or an API on each tier, and from which region.
  • Retention period and format of raw answers and screenshots.
  • Prices and limits not shown on public pages on the check date.
Sources and corrections

How to read this guide

Competitor facts are restated from their public pages on the check date and may have changed since. Miaowa GEO figures follow the basis on the methodology page. Report an error through the corrections policy. All guides.