Miaowa GEO vs Peec AI: prompts, models, cadence and evidence compared
How Miaowa GEO and Peec AI differ on platform coverage, prompt-and-model pricing, cadence, evidence and fit for Chinese exporters, based on both companies' public pages checked on 2026-09-10.
Version 1.1 · Last updatedMiaowa GEO is a self-serve subscription, not a managed agency service: the ChatGPT-only plan is ¥99 per month and the cross-platform plan ¥699 per month for one to three of six platforms, paid month by month with no auto-renewal; project and managed services are quoted separately. Peec AI is a Berlin-based AI search analytics platform for marketing teams and agencies, and one of the three vendors AI assistants name most often when asked for AI visibility tools. Miaowa GEO is built for Chinese outbound brands. The clearest difference is the pricing unit: Peec prices by prompts multiplied by models and frequency, Miaowa GEO fixes the prompt set and prices by platform count.
Peec AI · Miaowa GEO
| Dimension | Peec AI | Miaowa GEO |
|---|---|---|
| Target market | Marketing teams, SEO teams and agencies, largely in Europe and North America; agency plans for multi-brand tracking. | Chinese exporters, cross-border e-commerce and other outbound businesses that need to see how overseas AI platforms answer buyer questions; contracts, invoices and support in Chinese, site in zh/en/es/ja. |
| Platforms | Choose three models on Starter, Pro and Advanced from a list including ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity and Gemini; Enterprise tracks up to 12 models including Grok, DeepSeek, Qwen and Mistral, several labelled as API-based. | Six platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Claude. Self-serve plans cover one platform or one to three platforms; more by project contract. |
| Collection method | Peec's documentation says it uses browser automation through each platform's web interface rather than APIs; its enterprise model list labels some additional models as API sources. | Controlled browser environments using each product's normal web entry point; API responses are never passed off as web results. Every run keeps answer text, screenshot, source URLs, timestamp, region and language. |
| Cadence | Daily on self-serve tiers; daily or weekly on Enterprise. | One cycle every 72 hours, about 10–11 cycles per month; each prompt once per platform per cycle. |
| Prompt model | Starter 50 prompts / 3 models / 1 project; Pro 150 prompts / 2 projects; Advanced 350 prompts / 5 projects; monthly AI answers = prompts × models × frequency. Prompts can be split across brands. | Fixed 50 prompts per platform: 44 unbranded discovery/comparison prompts plus 6 branded fact checks. Not configurable on self-serve plans. |
| Evidence per run | Every run's full answer (chats) can be viewed and exported; each answer records the prompting location and lists every source URL, separating citations from sources; visibility, position and sentiment are tracked daily. Screenshot-level evidence is not described on the pages checked. | Per-task drill-down to task ID, status (answer / refusal / not triggered / failed / blocked), screenshot and sources; failures excluded from denominators; public read-only dashboard of its own project at /report (Chinese interface). |
| Pricing (public) | Published on peec.ai/pricing and based on prompt and model counts; amounts change and are not reproduced here. | ChatGPT-only plan ¥99 per month; cross-platform plan ¥699 per month for one to three platforms; annual = 11 monthly prices for 12 months; one brand per subscription; no auto-renewal. Project and managed service quoted by scope. |
| Exports and integrations | Looker Studio integration on Advanced; API access and SSO on Enterprise; MCP server documented. | Web report and per-task evidence in the workspace; PDF monthly report; CSV for structured outputs within scope; no general API. |
| Best fit | Teams that want to tune prompt counts and model mixes, share prompts across brands and connect data to BI tools. | Teams that want a fixed, comparable evidence basis across overseas platforms, Chinese-language contracting and support, and are willing to trade prompt flexibility for it. |
When to choose Peec AI
- You want to allocate a prompt budget across several brands or projects.
- You need BI connectors, an API or an MCP server.
- You track European or North American markets and do not need Chinese contracting.
When to choose Miaowa GEO
- You want the same 50 prompts asked the same way every 72 hours so that trends are not confounded by prompt changes.
- You need per-task screenshots and statuses that distinguish refusal, not-triggered and failure.
- You want a Chinese contracting entity, WeChat Pay and Chinese-language delivery.
What we could not verify
- Which Peec enterprise models are sampled through an API rather than the web interface.
- Peec's current prices and any regional pricing.
- How long Peec retains each answer and its sources.
Competitor facts checked on 2026-09-19; source pages: peec.ai/pricing; peec.ai/ai-instructions; docs.peec.ai. This page restates what the other vendor's public pages showed on the check date and makes no claim about which product is better. Their pages may have changed since; verify on their site before buying. Report errors through our corrections policy. Corrections policy · All comparisons